Paul as Missionary: Identity,Activity, Theology, and Practice. Edited by Trevor J. Burke and Brian S.
Rosner. Library of New Testament Studies 420.
London: T&T Clark, 2011, xi+276 pp., $130.00, hardcover.
Trevor J. Burke, Professor of Bible at Moody Bible
Institute, and Brian S. Rosner, Senior Lecturer in New Testament and Ethics at
Moore Theological College, contend that while Paul’s missionary activity has
been the focus of scholarly attention, this focus is normally directed towards
Acts. This collection of essays looks at what Paul thought about his own
missionary activity and identity. Part 1, which focuses on Paul’s identity,
begins with Seyoon Kim’s essay on Paul as an eschatological herald. Kim argues
that Paul sees himself as one who fulfills the eschatological pilgrimage texts
in his gentile mission; the Jerusalem collection is the most explicit
expression of this identity. James Thompson lays out points of contact between
Acts and Paul’s letters with regard to Paul’s missionary identity. However, he
concludes that focusing primarily on the letters brings out Paul’s distinct
pastoral concern with the spiritual growth and development of his
congregations. James Thompson’s essay argues that Paul’s mission involves
continual pastoral care. Though the term pastor is not used to describe Paul’s
identity, his activities and his concern for the transformation of the
Christ-followers suggest that Paul could be described as a missionary pastor.
James Miller’s essay on Paul and ethnicity contends that the binary categories of
continuity and discontinuity do not fully account for Paul’s complex and
situationally-specific approach to ethnicity. He claims that Paul did not leave
his Jewish ethnic identity in the past once he was in Christ; rather, the
various comments about his Jewish identity reflect the normal negotiation and
contextualization that contemporary ethnicity studies indicate are part of the
identity-forming process. Richard Gibson contends that Paul, in Rom 15:16,
presents himself as a Levitical priest as described in Isa 61:6. This
understanding clarifies Paul’s role as subordinate to the Servant-Christ, even
as he seeks to extend the Servant’s mission through the agency of the same
Spirit (cf. Isa 49:6; 61:6; Rom 15:8-21).
Part 2 covers Paul’s missionary activity. It begins
with Beverly Roberts Gaventa resituating Paul’s missionary activity within
God’s mission. She brings to the fore the agency of others within the
Christ-movement and concludes that God’s own mission of rescuing the new humanity
from the power of Sin and Death must be accounted for. Daniel Hays provides a
third ethnicity reading of Paul’s activity. He argues that Paul sought to form
a new ethnicity for those in Christ, an identity that replaces existing ethnic
identities. This, Hays contends, allows for unity within the Christ-movement.
Ayodeji Adewuya’s contribution looks at the centrality of suffering in Paul’s
theology and mission. Building on the rhetoric of 2 Corinthians, Adewuya sees
Paul’s sufferings re-deployed in the text for the benefit the Corinthians. Paul
Barnett argues that Paul’s use of the phrase “righteousness of God” coheres
quite closely with Jesus’ teaching on the “kingdom of God.” This provides a
conceptual bridge between Paul and Jesus, in that both of these phrases were
“grace-based and ritual-free” (p. 111).
Part 3 discusses Paul’s mission theology, beginning
with Arland Hultgren’s contention that Paul’s Christophany at his commissioning
accounts for much of Paul’s gentile mission. The content of this revelation
includes the following elements: (1) Jesus is the universal messiah who moves
beyond the law of Moses; (2) Jesus of Nazareth is the same as the risen Christ,
the one who was known to minister to those not Torah-observant. While some of
latter could have come from his pre-apostolic past, Hultgren concludes that the
eschatological pilgrimage texts did come from that experience and serve as a key
to Paul’s vocation as an apostle to the gentiles. Karl Olav Sandnes argues that
1 Cor 9:19-23 is an example of Paul’s asymmetrical approach to accommodation in
the context of seeking to win Jews and gentiles. His adaptability applies,
however, only to sub-identities (e.g., gender, ethnicity, culture) and not to
what he viewed as one’s primary identity—being in Christ. Trevor Burke contends
that the work of the Spirit is central to Paul’s mission and that the Spirit’s
agency is often overlooked by scholars. Burke surveys 1 Thessalonians to show
the way the Spirit functioned by empowering, converting, energizing,
sanctifying, instructing, and directing the worship life of the community.
Burke concludes that Paul’s mission activity cannot be fully understood without
an appropriate appreciation for the work of the Spirit within his communities.
Brian Rosner maintains that the glory of God is central to Paul’s mission
theology. This is often a discounted subject among scholars, but building on
Romans 15 and its use of Isaiah 66, Rosner views the glory of God as the final
aim in Paul’s missionary endeavors. Stanley Porter outlines a key aspect of
Paul’s highly contextualized missionary theology—the message of reconciliation.
It serves as the basis for Christian proclamation in 2 Cor 5:18-21 and provides
its essential component in Rom 5:8-11. Roy Ciampa navigates the difficulties of
distilling Paul’s theology of the gospel and describes it thus: “God has acted
and is acting through Christ’s life, death, resurrection/exaltation and present
reign as Lord over all creation to set all things right to the glory of his
name” (p. 190). This message is central to Paul’s missionary identity and
allows for contextualization among diverse gentile audiences.
Part 4 discusses Paul’s missionary practice. It begins
with William S. Campbell’s essay that argues that universalism and
particularism are both present in Paul’s missionary practice. In fact, the
coordination of the two is central to his vision and activity. Thus, Paul is
not seen as one who seeks to obliterate Jewish identity. In Christ, Jews relate
to God as Jews, and gentiles relate to God as gentiles, although they are not
included in God’s covenant, which remains with Israel (p. 202 n. 25). James Ware contends that Paul’s gospel was one of resurrection, and that he expected
the Philippians to be involved in an active mission of holding forth the word
of life (Phil 2:15-16). Steven Walton argues that Paul’s differing financial
dealings with the Philippians and the Corinthians are examples of the way he
sought to revise existing patronage structures. Michael Barram asks whether
Paul expected the Corinthians to be involved in mission. He suggests that
Paul’s missonal goal for the Corinthians was to live with a “salvific
intentionality” (p. 243). Randolph Richards discusses the misunderstandings of cultural
translation in Paul’s original mission (1 Cor 5:9-13) and suggests that many contemporary
western readings of Paul have likewise misread him because of their frames of
reference.
Burke and Rosner have done both Pauline and
missiological studies a great service in gathering these essays. Additional
instructive essay(s) might have considered in a more overt manner the material remains
as a context for Paul’s mission. This is only a slight criticism; Burke and
Rosner themselves note the need to include more (p. 6); however, these would
have provided a more concrete context for Paul and his mission. Nevertheless, Burke and Rosner provide a
nuanced and even-handed reading of Paul, with the essays by Miller, Sandnes,
and Campbell deserving special attention for moving forward the traditional
understanding of Paul’s approach to missional formation. This collection is
recommended for missions, intercultural, and Pauline theology courses and is
accessible to upper-level undergraduates and seminary students